There are several proposed tags changes lingering about here on meta. I thought I'd capture them all here, each one as a separate answer, and let people vote on them.

Awaiting Review


Completed

If you downvote a suggestion please explain why in a comment.

share
    
I'd leave sql as-is. There are a lot of questions tagged SQL on SO. – ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells Dec 9 '11 at 9:43

32 Answers 32

Remove

It's too generic to be useful.

share
    
Take a look at the 18 questions currently tagged with that. Seems like an appropriate tag to me. Broad but still useful as a categorization field. – Nick Chammas Feb 21 '12 at 15:50
    
@NickChammas I don't think so, since configuration is NOT transferrable between RDBMS implementations. You really should at the least have mysql-configuration, sql-server-configuration, etc. – JNK Feb 21 '12 at 15:56
4  
Tags are categories. You want MySQL configuration questions? You search for [mysql] [configuration]. SQL Server configuration? Search for [sql-server] [configuration]. Works better this way. Why? Because the tags are "normalized". :> – Nick Chammas Feb 21 '12 at 16:24

Delete .

It is too generic to be useful. Most questions tagged with this are better served by .

share
2  
Some DBMS platforms (e.g. SQL Server) have a feature called 'schema'. Re-tagging inappropriate use to 'database-design' is certainly sensible, but 'schema' itself can mean something quite specific. – ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells Dec 9 '11 at 9:51
1  
+1 for deletion - I'd argue that it is too localized - and that the added complication of the clash with the generally accepted meaning of 'schema' means the bar should be even higher before we accept it as a 'good' tag – Jack Douglas Mar 23 '12 at 15:59
2  
long conversation in The Heap bookmarked here – Jack Douglas Mar 23 '12 at 16:19
    
If you look at the wiki for this tag, it actually could be considered a synonym for database-design. Perhaps we need to come up with two different schema tags, one for design, the other for the logical division of tables within a database? – Chris Aldrich Mar 28 '12 at 12:43
    
Isn't [schema] also defined in the SQL standard? – Colin 't Hart Aug 4 '14 at 9:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .